Skip to main content

Are litter, plastic and microplastic quantities increasing in the ocean?


Whilst both plastic production and inputs at sea have increased since the 1950s, several modelling studies predict a further increase in the coming years in these respective quantities. We compiled scientific literature on trends in marine litter, consisting largely of plastic and microplastics in the ocean, understanding that monitoring programs or assessments for these aspects are varied, frequently focusing on limited components of the marine environment in different locations, and covering a wide spectrum of marine litter types, with limited standardization. Here we discuss how trends in the amounts of litter in the marine environment can be compared with the information provided by models. Increasing amounts of plastic are found in some regions, especially in remote areas, but many repeated surveys and monitoring efforts have failed to demonstrate any consistent real temporal trend. An observed steady state situation of plastic quantities in many marine compartments and the fate and transport of plastic in the marine environment remain areas for much needed further research.


Plastic cycling in the marine environment and trends in marine litter quantities over time remain important unanswered questions. While it is well established that vast quantities of plastic (a subset of marine litter) enter the ocean annually [19], it remains difficult to assess actual trends in the flux of plastics to the ocean simply because the seafloor is a major sink for marine litter, plastic and microplastics [3, 20, 36, 47]. Currently, there are no reliable estimates for either the quantity of plastics sinking to the seafloor, or for the potentially significant input of microplastics via atmospheric deposition [28]. Moreover, the sources of plastic in the marine environment are too numerous to account for and research on their impacts on the marine environment is ongoing.

It is now a common assumption that there is an excessive amount of plastic in the ocean. This fact, sometimes exaggerated, has been used by stakeholders and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to advocate for policies and economic solutions to reduce plastic [32]. Though there is a great need for systemic changes in plastic production, use and recycling strategies so as to reduce the volume of plastic in the ocean, it is still unknown whether the quantities of litter, plastic and microplastic abundances are currently actually increasing in the ocean.

While both plastic production and inputs to the sea have increased worldwide [5, 14, 19], plateauing levels of plastics measured at sea could be explained through the fragmentation of larger pieces not previously accounted for, or through their transfer from local to remote areas where measurements are scarce, especially in the deep sea. The question on how physical, chemical or biological degradation may limit the increase of plastics at sea is not yet resolved. Several modelling studies, based on waste production or extrapolated riverine inputs, predict increasing inputs of plastic to the ocean [11, 14, 17, 19, 21, 26, 27], that could be at least partially offset in the future by societal reduction measures [5, 23].


A closed mass balance of all marine litter in all seas would be needed to reliably converge on temporal trends. However, such an evaluation is not possible at this stage since fluxes of litter between various components of the marine system, especially rates of sinking and mechanisms of degradation and persistence, are not fully understood. Existing data, however, may help identify the important questions to address. We compiled scientific literature on global trends in marine litter amounts through an extensive search in science databases (See Supplementary material S1 on methods and S2 for a summary of references used). These monitoring programs or assessments most often report on the results of single surveys, discrete water samples, sediments or biota, and cover a wide spectrum of sizes, types, shapes, polymer types and colors, with limited data on nanoplastics. These differences in research techniques and methodologies can mask or amplify trends in marine plastic abundance. For instance, sampling for microplastics with nets often misses fibers and smaller-sized microplastics [34, 40], while studies isolating smaller fractions from water give counts of these materials that are not broadly consistent. Minimum cutoff sizes of microplastics measured in water or sediments differ between studies and are therefore difficult to compare. Plastics recorded in water and sediments are typically significantly larger than microplastics recorded in marine biota. These smaller microplastics that go undetected may cause impacts in marine organisms [15] and potentially lead to in human health effects [2]. Counting particles under a microscope has limitations. Smaller sizes can be missed and it is easy to confuse natural and polymer microfibers. In contrast, techniques such as Raman and FTIR spectroscopy coupled to microscopy can identify smaller-sized microplastics and characterize the nature of the polymers. If, over time, methodologies shift to standardized methods that may include using grab samples or smaller mesh nets or standardized size fractions, increasing attention to clean methods to reduce contamination from air, and harmonised analytical approaches, there will be greater comparability across studies to ascertain trends. Studies from different locations or time periods cannot currently be accurately compared.

When comparing modelling results with empirical data, a temporal increase in marine litter amounts was demonstrated in a limited number of studies for remote parts of the ocean, such as remote islands, the Antarctic [3], the Indian Ocean [10] and the South Atlantic [37], for plastic ingested by south Atlantic petrels [35], and in specific oceanographic features, including converging currents above the Arctic circle [41]. Interestingly, since the 1950s baseline, floating microplastics at sea increased exponentially each decade until the 2000s [42]. Very recently, Wilcox et al. [45] revisited the data on floating microplastics in the North Atlantic Ocean (which did not exhibit any trend from 1986 to 2008, [24]), and Brandon et al. [6] analyzed microplastics in sediments from California collected over a span of 175 years. Both studies suggested an increase in the amounts of microplastics, proportional to plastic production worldwide, as for a local study with very limited samples in the bay of Sydney [46]. However, most of the work based on regular and periodic monitoring surveys has not demonstrated any real trend in these quantities.

For large debris on beaches, an absence of temporal trend was demonstrated for macroplastics in the North Atlantic, between 2001 and 2011 [38], in Chile, between 2006 and 2016 [16] and for data from cleanups in Taiwan, between 2004 and 2016 [44]. An absence of temporal trends was also observed for large floating debris in the Balearic Islands between 2005 and 2015 [7] and in China, between 2007 and 2014 [49]. In addition, collections of marine litter by Continuous Plankton Recorders [33] showed relatively unchanged amounts trapped annually in the North East Atlantic since 2000, following a steady increase since the 1950s.

In seafloor litter studies, no change in plastic pollution was measured in Spain between 2007 and 2017 [12] nor in the North Sea [30]. A slight increase in seafloor plastics was observed in recent years in the Baltic (excluding fishing gear) [48], while results from observations in France, between 1995 and 2017 (23 years), showed mixed trends, of decreasing amounts between 2000 and 2013 and of increases since 2013 [13]. No trend was identified in Chinese waters for sea floor litter between 2007 and 2014 [49], with a large variability in plastics concentration and from data collected during regular State monitoring between 2011 and 2018 [31]. In contrast, a decrease in total seafloor litter was measured between 2007 and 2017, in both the Alboran Sea [12] and the northern Adriatic, [39], without significant temporal trends for plastic in the remaining Adriatic.

For microplastics, floating particles were found at similar levels between 2005 and 2014 in East Greenland [1], in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre between 1986 and 2008 [24] and in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre between 2001 and 2012 [25]. In addition, no changes in floating microplastics (> 150 μm) were detected between 1987 and 2015 in the Baltic Sea [4], between 1987 and 2012 in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre [43] and between 2001 and 2012 in the North Pacific Subtropical gyre [25]. For ingested large debris, constant levels were also demonstrated for stranded cetaceans recorded from Irish waters between 1990 and 2015 [29], and in western Mediterranean sea turtles between 1995 and 2016 [9].

Finally, understanding that quantifications of small ingested microplastics, by mass, may range from 1 to 2% to 30–90% of control tests that are positive [18, 22], constant levels were also demonstrated for ingested microplastics by little auks in the Arctic [1], in herring and sprats from the Baltic sea between 1987 and 2015 [4], in deep sea benthic invertebrates between 1976 and 2015 [8], and in fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) from the North Sea [43].

Conclusion and future perspectives

Most studies indicate constant amounts of litter in coastal marine systems in recent years until 2019. The increase in plastic quantities observed in remote areas over time could therefore be interpreted as a long-term transfer of litter from directly affected areas to regions where human activity is either extremely reduced or non-existent. Nevertheless, while the predicted total global amount of plastic litter is increasing, as suggested by models, the apparent steady state situation of plastic quantities observed in coastal systems challenges our ability to predict plastic sources and fate. More standardization and coordination is needed before we can reliably report on trends in plastic waste. Decreasing marine temporal trends is possible for specific types of plastics, subject to societal reduction measures, as is the case for industrial pellets, which have received much consideration in regional action plans following changes in industrial practices. Formulating scenarios on the future effect of proposed management measures [5, 23] is reminiscent of debates starting many years ago around climate change, with model predictions identifying the need for data, leading to longer-term observational efforts. Until the mechanisms behind the apparent steady-state amounts of plastics recorded in surveys across the marine environment are better understood, the identification of possible trends will remain a challenge. There remain many data gaps and uncertainties on the rates of degradation, burial and transport of plastics in the marine domain. Only more scientific research can provide quantification of the plastic pollution problem in marine systems to begin to fully address its sources, thus identifying solutions which must come from the international community through a global ocean governance framework. The basic questions about where marine litter is, goes, how it degrades and cycles in the ocean have definitely not been fully answered and in the upcoming UN Decade for Ocean Sciences, this should definitely be a priority.

Availability of data and materials

The present paper is based on published data.


  1. 1.

    Amelineau F, Bonnet D, Heitz O, Mortreux V, Harding A, Karnovsky N, Walkusz W, Fort J, Grémillet D. Microplastic pollution in the Greenland Sea: background levels and selective contamination of planktivorous diving seabirds. Environ Pollut. 2016;219:1131–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barboza L, Vethaak A, Lavorante B, Lundebye A, Guilhermino L. Marine microplastic debris: an emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;133:336–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barnes D, Galgani F, Thompson R, Barlaz M. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2009;364(1526):1985–98

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Beer S, Garm A, Huwer B, Dierking J, Gissel Nielsen T. No increase in marine microplastic concentration over the last three decades–a case study from the Baltic Sea. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:1272–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Borrelle S, Ringma J, Lavender Law K, Monnahan C, Lebreton L, McGivern A, Murphy E, Jambeck J, Leonard G, Hilleary M, Eriksen M, Possingham H, De Frond H, Gerber L, Polidoro B, Tahir A, Bernard M, Mallos N, Barnes M, Rochman C. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science. 2020;369(6510):1515–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brandon J, Jones W, Ohman M. Multidecadal increase in plastic particles in coastal ocean sediments. Sci Adv. 2019;5(9)

  7. 7.

    Compa M, March D, Deudero S. Spatio-temporal monitoring of coastal floating marine debris in the Balearic Islands from sea-cleaning boats. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;141:205–14

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Courtene-Jones W, Quinn B, Ewin C, Gary S, Narayanaswamy B. Consistent microplastic ingestion by deep-sea invertebrates over the last four decades (1976–2015), a study from the north East Atlantic. Environ Pollut. 2019;244:503–12

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Domènech F, Aznar F, Raga J, Tomas J. Two decades of monitoring in marine debris ingestion in loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, from the western Mediterranean. Environ Pollut. 2019;244:367–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dunlop SW, Dunlop BJ, Brown M. Plastic pollution in paradise: daily accumulation rates of marine litter on Cousine Island, Seychelles. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;151:110803

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Everaert G, Van Cauwenberghe L, De Rijcke M, Koelmans A, Mees J, Vandegehuchte M, Janssen C. Risk assessment of microplastics in the ocean: Modelling approach and first conclusions. Environ Pollut. 2018;242:1930–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    García-Rivera S, Sanchez Lizazo J, Bellido Millan J. Spatial and temporal trends of marine litter in the Spanish Mediterranean seafloor. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;137:252–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gerigny O, Brun M, Fabri MC, Tomasino C, Lemoigne M, Jadaud A, Galgani F. Seafloor litter from the continental shelf and canyons in French Mediterranean water: distribution, typologies and trends. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;146:653–66

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Geyer R, Jambeck J, Lavender Law K. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Green D, Kregting L, Boots B, Blockley D, Brickle P, Da Costa M, Crowley Q. A comparison of sampling methods for seawater microplastics and a first report of the microplastic litter in coastal waters of Ascension and Falkland Islands. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;137:695–701

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hidalgo-Ruz V, Zimmer H, Gatta Rosemary M, Nunez P, Hinojosa I, Thiel M. Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;126:516–24

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Isobe A, Iwasaki S, Uchida K. Abundance of non-conservative microplastics in the upper ocean from 1957 to 2066. Nat Commun. 2019;417(2019):10

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jabeen K, Su L, Li J, Yang D, Tong C, Mu J, Shi H. Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environ Pollut. 2017;221(2017):141–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jambeck J, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler T, Perryman W, Andrady T, Narayan N, Lavender Law K. Plastic waste inputs from land intothe ocean. Science. 2015;347(622):768

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kane A, Clare M, Miramontes E, Wogelius R, Tothwell J, Garreau P, Pohl F. Seafloor microplastic hotspots controlled by deep-sea circulation. Science. 2020;368(6495):1140–5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kako S, Isobe A, Kataoka T, Hinata H. A decadal prediction of the quantity of plastic marine debris litteredon beaches of the east Asian marginal seas. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;81(1):174–84

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kühn S, van Franeker JA, O’Donoghue A, Swiers A, Starkenburg M, van Werven B, Foekema E, Hermsen E, Egelkraut-Holtus M, Lindeboom H. Details of plastic ingestion and fibre contamination in North Sea fishes. Environ Pollut. 2020;257

  23. 23.

    Lau W, Shiran Y, Bailey R, Cook E, et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science. 2020;368(6495):1140–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lavender Law K, Moret-Ferguson S, Maximenko N, Proskurowski G, Peacock E. Plastic accumulation ´ in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Science. 2010;329:1185–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lavender Law K, Moret ferguson S, Goodwin D, Zettler E, DeForce E, Kulkula T, Prokurowski G. Distribution of surface plastic debris in the eastern Pacific Ocean from an 11-year data set. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(9):4732–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lebreton L, Van de zwet J, Damsteg J, Slat B, Andrady A, reisser J. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15611

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lebreton L, Slat B, Ferrari F, Sainte Rose B, Aitken J, et al. Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4666

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu K, Wu T, Wang X, Song Z, Wei N, Li D. Consistent transport of terrestrial microplastics to the ocean through atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;53.18(2019):10612–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lusher, et al. Incidence of marine debris in cetaceans stranded and bycaught in Ireland: recent findings and a review of historical knowledge. Environ Pollut. 2018;232:467–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Maes T, Barry J, Leslie H, Vethaak D, Nicolaus E, Law R, et al. Below the surface: Twenty-five years of seafloor litter monitoring in coastal seas of North West Europe (1992–2017). Sci Total Environ. 2018;630:790–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    MEE/PRC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, People Republic of China). Bulletin of marine ecological environmental status of China in 2018. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Monahan P. Will plastic really outweigh fish in the ocean by 2050? Sci Mag News. 2016;2016:02

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ostle C, Thompson R, Broughton D, Gregory L, Wootton M, Jones D. The rise in ocean plastics evidenced from a 60-year time series. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pabortsava K, Lampitt R. High concentrations of plastic hidden beneath the surface of the Atlantic Ocean. Nat Commun. 2020;4073(2020):11

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Petry M, Benemann V. Ingestion of marine debris by the white-chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis): is it increasing over time off southern Brazil? Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;117(1–2):131–5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pohl F, Eggenhuisen J, Kane C, Clare M. Transport and burial of microplastics in deep-arine sediments by turbidity currents. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(7):4180–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ryan P, Dilley B, Ronconi R, Connan M. Rapid increase in Asian bottles in the South Atlantic Ocean indicates major debris inputs from ships. PNAS. 2019;116(42):20892–7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schulz M, Neumann D, Fleet D, Matthies M. A multi-criteria evaluation system for marine litter pollution based on statistical analyses of OSPAR beach litter monitoring time series. Mar Environ Res. 2013;92:61–70

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Strafella P, Fabi G, Despalatovic M, Cvitovic I, Fortibuoni T, et al. Assessment of seabed litter in the Northern and Central Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean) over six years. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;141:24–35

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Taylor M, Gwinnett C, Robinson L, Woodall L. Plastic microfibre ingestion by deep-sea organisms. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33997

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tekman M, Krumpen T, Bergman M. Marine litter on deep Arctic seafloor continues to increase and spreads to the north at the HAUSGARTEN observatory. Deep-Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2017;120:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Thompson R, Olsen Y, Mitchell R, Davis A, Rowland S. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science. 2004;304:838

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Van Franeker J, Lavender Law K. Seabirds, gyres and global trends in plastic pollution. Environ Pollut. 2015;203:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Walther B, Kunz A, ShenHu C. Type and quantity of coastal debris pollution in Taiwan. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;135:862–72

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wilcox C, Hardesty BD, Lavender law K. Abundance of floating plastic particles is increasing in the Western North Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;54(2):790–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Willis K, Erikwen R, Wilcox C, Hardesty BD. Microplastic distribution at different sediment depths in an urban estuary. Front Mar Sci. 2017; 19 December 2017.

  47. 47.

    Woodall L, Sanchez Vidal A, Canals M, Paterson G, et al. The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. R Soc Open Sci. 2014;1(4):140317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zablotski Y, Kraak S. Marine litter on the Baltic seafloor collected by the international fish-trawl survey. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;141:448–61

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhou C, Liu X, Wang Z, Yang T, et al. Assessment of marine debris in beaches or seawaters around the China Seas and coastal provinces. Waste Manag. 2016;48:652–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This document was inspired during the preparation of the chapter Marine Litter from the second United Nations World Ocean Assessment (WOA 2) to be published in the coming months and most contributors of the present document were involved in its preparation.


All contributors were self funded.

Author information




The initial version was drafted by FG, then discussed, corrected and finalized by all authors. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francois Galgani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galgani, F., Brien, A.So., Weis, J. et al. Are litter, plastic and microplastic quantities increasing in the ocean?. Micropl.&Nanopl. 1, 2 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Plastic pollution
  • Marine litter
  • Microplastics
  • Trends
  • Monitoring