Skip to main content

Table 1 Data sources and measurement procedures

From: A multilevel dataset of microplastic abundance in the world’s upper ocean and the Laurentian Great Lakes

Project No.

Reference

Area

Sampling method

Mesh size [mm]

Number of data

Without fiber (%)

Flowmeter

Identification

Unit

(1)

Law et al. [11]

eastern North Pacific

Na

0.335

2529

NRb

W/Oc

Vd

pieces/km2

(2)

T/V Umitaka, Japan (unpublished)e

Southern Ocean, Pacific

N

0.35

128

100f

Wg

FTIR

pieces/m3

(3)

Ministry of the Environment, Japan (unpublished)h

East Asian seas

N

0.35

312

100f

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(4)

Collignon et al. [12]

the Mediterranean

Wi

0.2

38

NR

W/O

V

pieces/100m2

(5)

Cózar et al. [10]

world’s ocean

N

0.2

194

100f

W

V

pieces/km2

(6)

Cózar et al. [13]

the Mediterranean

N

0.2

39

93.6

W

V

g/km2

(7)

Cózar et al. [14]

Arctic Ocean

Mj

0.5

42

100f

W/O

V

pieces/km2

(8)

Doyle et al. [15]

Bering Sea

M

0.505

271

80

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(9)

Eriksen et al. [7]

world’s ocean

N

0.33

679

100k

W/O

V

pieces/km2

(10)

Goldstein et al. [16]

eastern North Pacific

N

0.333

147

100k

W

V

pieces/m3

(11)

de Lucia et al. [17]

the Mediterranean

M

0.5

4

NR

W

V

pieces/m3

(12)

Lusher et al. [18]

Arctic Ocean

M & Im

0.333

21

100l

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(13)

Lusher et al. [19]

eastern North Atlantic

I

0.25n

652

4

Raman

pieces/m3

(14)

Pan et al. [20]

western North Pacific

M

0.33

18

91.1

W/O

Raman

pieces/km2

(15)

Pedrotti et al. [21]

the Mediterranean

M

0.33

33

100

W/O

FTIR

pieces/km2

(16)

Reisser et al. [22]

Waters around Australia

N&M

0.33

57

93.6

W/O

FTIR

pieces/km2

(17)

Suaria, G., C. G., et al. [23]

the Mediterranean

N

0.2

74

100f

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(18)

Zhang et al. [24]

Bohai Sea

M

0.33

11

73

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(19)

Zhao et al. [25]

East China Sea

N

0.333

15

16.8

W/O

V

pieces/m3

(20)

Law et al. [26] o

western North Atlantic & Caribbean Sea

N

0.335

2280

NR

W/O

V

pieces/km2

(21)

Mason et al. [27]

Lakes Erie & Ontario

M

0.333

130

98

W

FTIR

pieces/km2

(22)

Indonesian Institute of Science (unpublished)

Java Sea

N

0.35

16

NR

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(23)

Ifremer (unpublished)

eastern North Atlantic & the Mediterranean

M & Bp

0.3

256

NR

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(24)

Pacific Geographical Institute & Maritime State Univ. (unpublished)

Sea of Japan

N & Pq

0.1

21

100l

W

FTIR

pieces/m3

(25)

Kanhai et al. [28] r

eastern Atlantic

I

0.25

76

0 ~ 100s

FTIR

pieces/m3

(26)

Yakushev et al. [29]

Arctic Ocean

N & I

0.2, 0.1t

108

0 ~ 100

W/O

FTIR, μFTIRu

pieces/m3

(27)

Kanhai et al. [30] v

Arctic Ocean

I

0.25

58

0

FTIR

pieces/m3

  1. aNeuston net, b Not recorded, c Without a flowmeter, d Visual identification, e Partly published in Isobe et al. [31] and Isobe et al. [5], f Fibrous microplastics were discarded by this project., g With a flowmeter, h Partly published in Isobe et al. [32], i WP2 net, j Manta net, k The authors stated that the “vast majority” of collected microplastics were fragments. l The abundance without fibrous microplastics was provided by the coauthor. m Intake seawater, n The lower size limit in this project, o 88% of fragments collected in this project were smaller than 10 mm, while fragments between 5 and 10 mm in size account for approximately 5% of all microplastics shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Thus, 83% (0.88 × 0.95) was categorized as microplastics < 5 mm in size. p Bongo net, q Plankton net, r These data were included only in Levels 0 and 1 data because the intake depth of 11 m was largely different from other studies. s The proportions of fragments were given at each station (see Level_1_2.csv of Supplementary data). t 0.1-mm was used for the continuous seawater intake. u μFTIR is used for the continuous seawater intake
  2. vThese data were included only in Levels 0 and 1 data because the intake depth of 8.5 m was largely different from other studies